Dominion Lunch
   
    Register Arcade  •  FAQ  •  Search  •  Login     
It is currently Thu Sep 09, 2010 11:11 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Welcome
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, sign up today!


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Ida, the "missing link"
PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 8:28 am 
Offline
DORK FACE SUPREME
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:06 am
Posts: 8031
may not be after all.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091021/ap_on_sc/us_sci_controversial_fossil


Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Ida, the "missing link"
PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 8:50 am 
Offline
VP of awesomeness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:14 am
Posts: 5246
I think darwinius is my new favorite word


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ida, the "missing link"
PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 8:55 am 
Offline
DORK FACE SUPREME
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:06 am
Posts: 8031
It would be my pet name for my winky, had I felt the need to give it a nickname

_________________
HI JENNY!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ida, the "missing link"
PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 9:18 am 
There is no such thing as a missing link.
We have more than enough links.

However this happens all the time, they are just arguing over where exactly in the tree it should be put.
Neanderthal was first thought to be a "link". However now we realize it was just an off shoot. Another branch if you will. We did not evolve from them, they evolved separately.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ida, the "missing link"
PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 9:24 am 
Offline
DORK FACE SUPREME
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:06 am
Posts: 8031
This new skeleton is now though to be a lemur. News agencies really don't care if something has been peer reviewed. If it can generate excitement in the general population, they run with it. That's why I never pay attention to ANYTHING reported by the Center for Science in the Puplic Interest.

_________________
HI JENNY!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ida, the "missing link"
PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 9:27 am 
Offline
VP of awesomeness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:14 am
Posts: 5246
zerospeaks wrote:
There is no such thing as a missing link.


You obviously have no idea who Manny Ramirez is then


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ida, the "missing link"
PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 9:29 am 
Offline
DORK FACE SUPREME
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:06 am
Posts: 8031
Remember Milt Thompson? He might be

_________________
HI JENNY!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ida, the "missing link"
PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 10:08 am 
"News agencies really don't care if something has been peer reviewed."

It is being peer-reviewed right now.
That's why the debate over it has begun.

Apparently this guy sat on it for years and now that it is out the real debate can begin.
I have a feeling they will end up siding with him though. He had several different experts from different fields study it for years before they decided to classify it and release it.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ida, the "missing link"
PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:24 pm 
Offline
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 6:29 pm
Posts: 497
Last I saw Ida didn't have enough strepsirrhine characterisitcs to be in the lemur group, so was sort of assigned to the haplorrhines (monkey/ape mega group). Has this changed?

_________________
Life as a primatologist
http://monkeytroubleresearch.blogspot.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ida, the "missing link"
PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 4:20 pm 
Offline
DORK FACE SUPREME
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:06 am
Posts: 8031
The article said it is in the family that includes lemurs. I don't know how broad that is

_________________
HI JENNY!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ida, the "missing link"
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 8:12 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:16 pm
Posts: 29497
gorillagirl wrote:
Last I saw Ida didn't have enough strepsirrhine characterisitcs to be in the lemur group, so was sort of assigned to the haplorrhines (monkey/ape mega group). Has this changed?


GG is SMART. :)

_________________
Last of the Lunch Krew

dominion wrote:
BACKDOOR, BABY!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ida, the "missing link"
PostPosted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 3:56 am 
Offline
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 6:29 pm
Posts: 497
Awww, thanks Logan, but I have the dumb a lot of time.

The doco I saw said that Ida wasn't placed in the lemur group because she lacked the features that are found in the group, but I see they have changed their mind now.

_________________
Life as a primatologist
http://monkeytroubleresearch.blogspot.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ida, the "missing link"
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:14 pm 
Offline
Let's Go Phillies!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:28 pm
Posts: 8842
Location: drunk all around this town
zerospeaks wrote:
There is no such thing as a missing link.
We have more than enough links.

However this happens all the time, they are just arguing over where exactly in the tree it should be put.
Neanderthal was first thought to be a "link". However now we realize it was just an off shoot. Another branch if you will. We did not evolve from them, they evolved separately.


Did you see they came out and said we used to have sex with neandrathals? I'm guessing it wasn't our male ancestors who were going for the hairy, muscular, and dangerous types.

_________________
dominion wrote:
I've always wanted to watch in bliss as I feed a perfect woman to a bunch of ravenous sharks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ida, the "missing link"
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:01 pm 
Quote:
Did you see they came out and said we used to have sex with neandrathals? I'm guessing it wasn't our male ancestors who were going for the hairy, muscular, and dangerous types.


It would make sense.
Human females evolved to accept the genes of a man who could bring home the most meat, to provide for the family.
Human males evolved to give genes to any woman willing to accept them.

The truth sucks.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ida, the "missing link"
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:48 pm 
Offline
Let's Go Phillies!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:28 pm
Posts: 8842
Location: drunk all around this town
What? No, it wasn't about forming a traditional family unit. They were a different species and the mating couldn't produce offspring. It was all about the bad ass neanderthals getting some evolved poon.

_________________
dominion wrote:
I've always wanted to watch in bliss as I feed a perfect woman to a bunch of ravenous sharks.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: